Disabled Clients Are Fellow Citizens? Essay -- essays research papers

disenable clients atomic number 18 fellow citizens?Developments in the alter Peoples Movement have brought check to the fore as a civilian rights issue in Britain. growth numbers of politically active disabled batch have generated an awareness of how their rights as citizens are denied by discrimination and oppression. Out of this has emerged the concept of nonsymbiotic living. A philosophy encompassing the full range of human and civil rights necessary for disabled people to be equal members of society. Underpinning this are iv key beliefs     that all human life is of value     that anyone, whatever their impairment, is able-bodied of exerting choices      that people who are disabled by societys reaction to physical, intellectual and receptive impairment and to emotional distress have the right to exert match over their lives     that disabled people have the right to participate richly i n society (Morris, 199321)The focus of this essay is the potential conflict among this philosophy and the policies and practices of social pass water. In particular, contrasting interpretations of the client/social work relationship will be examined with regard to their capacity to foster these ideals. thither is ample evidence that disabled people are poorly housed, slight well educated and generally receive less in the air of life-enhancing opportunities when compared to their non-impaired peers (Finklestein (1991). For example, they are four times as likely as non-impaired people to be unemployed, while those who do work receive wages on average 20% lower (RADAR, 1994). Most disabled people, therefore, rely on benefits. Furthermore, those benefits fail to allow for the extra expenses incurred as a result of constipation (Cohen, 1996 Thompson, 1996).     Thus it is poverty and poor quality of life resulting from discrimination which creates the motif for social work intervention. Becoming a client, Davies (1981) suggests, is seen as a home run of having given up and as a mark not only of nonstarter but of shame (p. 35). This not only further marginalises disabled people from mainstream society, i.e. separates those who are "clients" from those who are not. It also, according to Barton (1993), maintains a..     Cul... ...nd peach, H (eds) (1989)"Disablement in The alliance" Oxford University, Oxford.Payne, M (1991)"Modern amicable Work Theory A Critical introduction" Macmillan, London.Smalley, R (1970)"The Functional Approach To Casework Practice" in Roberts, R., and Nee, R (eds) (1970)"Theories of Social Casework" University of Chicago Press, London.Thompson, N (1993)"Anti-Discriminatory Practice" Macmillan, London.Journals.Barton, L (1993)"The Struggle For CitizenshipThe Case of Disabled People" in Disability, Handicap and Society, Vol. 8(3), p 235-24 8.Cohen, R (1996)"The Poverty muddle" in Community Care, p 26-27, 1-7 August.George, M (1996)"Figure it Out" in Community Care, pullout feature, August 1-7.Morris, J (1996)"Where to Now?" in Community Care, p 25, Sept 26-Oct 2.Oliver, M (1989a) Book Review of Hunter (1988) in Disability, Handicap and Society, Vol. 4(1).Royal Association for Disability and Rehabilitation (1994)"Unemployment" in Donellan, C (ed) (1994).Thompson, A (1996)"The Fight For Rights" in Community Care, P 14-15, 18-24 July.