Amadeus Biopic Essay

Told from the flash sustain perspective of an aged Antonio Salieri in an insane asylum to a priest for a confession, the characterisation reveals Antonios introduction to Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, his professional sustenanceer with Mozart, and his acidulated rivalry and betrayal of Mozart. The pic depicts an inaccurate account of Mozarts emotional state sole(prenominal) if button up delivers on the pieces which he composed.Through pop the film, were exposed to what are clearly historical inaccuracies. I understand that this film is an fitting of the original Peter Shaffers Amadeus sufficeed on Broadway in the 1980s and for stringently theatrical purposes to endow the bal aney with a plot, these changes had to either be implement or further purely fabricated in order for the story to make sense. However, some of the monstrous interpretations of Mozarts life are just impossible to ignore for everyone who even had even the simplest understanding of his life, such as mys elf.The predominant trait of Mozart that stuck out to me like a sore switch was his high pitched cackling laughter. The photographs laugh for Amadeus was constructed from letters that referenced Mozart having an infectious, giddy laugh much like metal scraping chalk according to Forman. However, Robert L. Marshall(a), author of Film as Musicology Amadeus, discredits this notion as thither were no citations that provided the existence of such letters. Since Mozart lived over two centuries ago, in that respects no possible way to know exactly how he sounded.However, the splendid Mozart in the film is supposed to be divinitys creature (The Latin adaptation of Amadeus translates to jockeyr of God or beloved by God) that usurps the reasonable Salieris position as the voice of God. So in effect, his laugh is God mocking Salieri in his mediocrity which further drives the frustration and anger of Salieri towards Mozart therefrom pushing the plot a large. slice were on that subj ect, there is low evidence that Mozart and Salieri actually rivaled each separate to the extreme that the photographic film depicts. Certainly, they were rivals, but they were professional rivals.By professional rivals, I mean that even though they often butted heads in their pursuit of euphony and their attempted publicity of their works, they still admired and respected each other greatly. Despite Salieri being the insufficient musician, he still pooled great respect from Emperor Joseph II and his subjects and served as court composer, director of the Italian opera, and court conductor. Mozart on the other strive came as an outsider therefore did not possess the same wreak or reputation as Salieri. To me, this just appears to be the politics of music its not what you know, its who you know.Regardless, Salieri really didnt fetch a reason to hate Mozart as much as the movie shows because his function alone virtually neutralized Mozart as a threat. Im sure when Mozart attemp ted to get his operas on the Italian submits it must read certainly irked Salieri, but never to the point of violence. However, once again the manu accompanimenturing is created in order to develop a sensical plot line. Without that aggressive rivalry, theres no movie. iodine last thing that I personally found confusing is that absence of Joesph Haydn from the entire movie.History tells us that Mozart and Haydn met someplace 1783 or 1784 and instantly hit it off. They both admired each others work immensely and Mozart even went as far as to dedicate six string quartets to Haydn as a tribute to the start out of the string quartet. Throughout their lives, they were in correspondence with one another up until Mozarts death. However, despite this documented historical fact, Haydn is still left out of the movie. The movie itself is about two famous classical composers so why not add Haydn to attract Haydn fans to the play or movie?One can only guess as to why that is. Perhaps Form an sentiment that the addition of another prominent classical composer would ultimately lessen the importance of the feud between Mozart and Salieri. But Forman fashioned other characters throughout the film in order to serve roles that further drove the plot, so why not use Haydn instead? Or at least elevate him? At one point in the film, Mozart mentions that he doesnt care for Gluck (which is also inaccurate, he was an admirer of Gluck), but nevertheless, he still at least mentions the name.At this point its all speculation and I cant find anywhere an explanation for his absence. The movie is pierce with other inaccuracies that raise a lot of questions, but if anything I in condition(p) in English is true, its that in order to read any literature thats fiction or watch any movie, youre supposed to suspend yourself in willful disbelief meaning that bask it for what it is without dissecting it too much, which I can honestly and wholeheartedly swan I did. Although it doesnt gi ve an accurate portrayal of Mozart, Salieri or the setting its supposed to be placed in, it still gives an enjoyable experience.Despite the erroneous depiction, the musical pieces revealed chronologically throughout the film are in fact the offspring of Mozarts genius. Whilst enjoying each piece as much as the next, I dont have the musical ear or expertise to discern which piece is being played in which sight, deviation from the operas. However, the films composer John Strauss created a two disc soundtrack for the film and I have to admit, even though I lack the expertise, I am astonished by Mozarts ability.Luckily, between the internet and my own mothers personal love for music (Fortunately, she had a library of CDs that included many of Mozarts work), I was able to essentially find each individual piece at bottom the movie. I have to say, my favorite musical piece offered in the movie is the finale of the Don Giovanni. Perhaps some of it is because of the twist that Salieri pu ts on it that only he understood that the horrifying apparition was Leopald raised from the dead The inference that I took from that between the monumental sounding music and the fervently conducting Mozart in the scene is that Mozart poured his personal misfortune of not living up to his fathers expectations in his work. It just makes it seem to be so personal, so passionate. I know that was the movies intent for me to feel that way, but I couldnt wait on getting sucked in, between seeing the gargantuan black commander tattle in the deep bass voice is what seems to me to be such an accuse tone allegorically accusing his son in front of the world as Salieri puts it.All the while the plot twists during this play, as the madness grew inside Salieri as he discovers such a simple way to write down Mozart. Its just so epic, for lack of better words. One of the brighter operas in the film The Marriage of Figgaro has a much lighter note. Despite all of the red tape Mozart endures, he n evertheless through the exceptionally brilliance of his music and borderline arrogance persuades the emperor to allow him to perform his opera.While we obviously never get to see the whole thing, the music and executing we do see is good. I wouldnt say I especially cared for it. The colors, the notes, the lighting, its just too bright. However, the most impressive part of it is that his reliance in his music allowed him to break the traditional rules in order for his perform his opera. This seems metaphorically to portray the fact that Mozarts music didnt come with these contemporary musical rules of the time which contributed to his genius.Perhaps thats a long stretch, but thats immediately what came to mind. While the movie is composed (Pun intended) of Mozarts work, it would take an entire separate paper to dissect each one individually. Regardless, each piece performed in the play is enjoyable from one point in time to another. Overall, I have to say I was more than happy w ith this movie. For a while, I dreaded watching the movie thinking it would be a long drawn out boring biographic film, but to my wonder it shared little characteristics with a biography.The central thematic message of the movie is mostly if not entirely fictitious, but still lays a foundation garment in which the movie tells factual information about Mozart and sets a stage in which one can hear the pieces and enjoy them chronologically. To be wienerwurst and honest, if these fabrications of the bitter rivalry between Salieri and Mozart werent there, I would have had a hard time truly appreciating the Mozart as seen in the movie. Not to say his music is bad, its brilliant, but the underlying plot is what made the movie so interesting. Ultimately, if youre touch sensationing for historical facts about Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, look elsewhere. If youre looking for a movie thats interesting and loosely base on one of the worlds greatest composers who ever lived, look no further.